Sunday, July 5, 2009

Kuki-Naga Bhai-Bhai??

Posted by: "Carey Suante" http://in.mc391.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=mailme_carey@yahoo.com&Subject=suantec
Mon Jun 18, 2007 6:59 am (PST)
While many still sit tight waiting to see what will happen next after the Moreh incident last week the NSCN (IM) are quick to take advantage of the circumstances. The NSCN (IM) in their rather timely press release extended their friendship and goodwill to the Kukis and condemned the acts of those responsible for the killings. What is interesting is the timing or untimely of the press release and their claim that ‘Kukis in Nagaland are very much Nagas and within the Naga fold'. They however failed to mention or acknowledge their own distruction of the Kuki villages and the killings of the hundreds of Kukis during the 1990s.However the KNO are quick to point out that whilst it lauds the gesture of friendship by the NSCN(IM) it must first of all relent and acknowledge mistake in its Kuki genocide campaign in the 1990s.The KNO's reply was not unexpected and rather an appropriate one.Firstly of all, if NSCN (IM) wants to sincerely extend their friendship it was too soon after the Moreh incident and it should first and foremost acknowledge theri mistake and seek the latter's blessing. Their motive is therefore rather suspicious.Secondly, the NSCN (IM)'s condemnation of the killing seems to somehow show their true colour and their double-standard approach towards the Kukis. They were the ones who killed hundreds of Kukis with and without Nagaland. They were responsible for of all for the circumstances and the social anarchy that exist within the Kukis today. In short, they are the ones responsible for the plight of the Kukis be it in Manipur and elsewhere.Hence the KNO has every right to be rather suspicious and sound too careful in their reply to the press release.However as KNO pointed out it is never too late to begin a new era of friendship and harmony for the two warrying tribes. The KNO should also, as it did, appreciate the strength and willingness of the NSCN (IM) to join hands in friendship and in partnership. The KNO will also be welladvised if they read the political situation of Manipur that their is another party in the horizon whose intent is rather clear from the Moreh incident that this new threat to their society maybe kept in check by such "friendship" . That the Kukis need not be Nagas but reap the fruits of their friendship in this troubled times. The Kukis need all the help it can garner to fight off this new threat and the Nagas need partners to further their cause in Manipur. What better way to make friends than have a common enemy? When better time than when one is in need of a friend. Let bygones be bygones. Kuki-Naga, Bhai-Bhai??

Carey Pum Khan Tuang Suantewww.zoaw.tk www.careysuante. tkwww.freewebs. com/careysuante

Why do we need a tribe when we can be a nation? Bang hanga tribe level pen buaipih mahmah i hi tam maw ka ci hi. Bang hanga Zomi cih ah lungkim lo i hi tam? Bang hanga Zomi sang tribe min kinbawl zaw ciat sese i hi tam? Bang hanga Zomi ading nasem lo a, tribe ading sih ngam a pang leuleu si i hi tam? Mun pawlkhat ah tribe pen Zomi level in a paisak sawm om tawh kibang hi. Tua in Zomi pen a nei tuam khat omsak hi hang ci kitel mahmah hi. Zomi cih pen Tedim pau zangte bek genna a sa om hi dingin um ing. Kikhen vet ding i hih uh leh kikhen cian vet leeng, eima a ciat puah tek ni. Zomi pen siksan a zanga, gulmatna a zanga eima tribe ciat promote (lamsang) i hih leh bel thupi sa khol kei ing. I suahtak ding um tuan khol keng. Globalization leitungah suakta khollo maithei hi. Mimal upmawhna bek hi sam. Hau Za Cin Phuitong Liim

1 comment:

oking said...

Kuki-Naga enmity would not exist there were not an instigation from a third party. It is good for both Naga and Kuki to be aware of this third force in order to harness a friendly relationship. The path both these community must travel are more or less parallel.